Climate Change Data Dumped… Time to Dump Cap and Trade

Posted by courage On November - 30 - 2009

From the UK Times Online:

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data went in to the trash making replication impossible for  honest scientists.  Why is this important?  Without the raw data it is impossible to validate the conclusions the UEA made regarding the climate change.  Furthermore the the publicly released emails point to collusion and intentional deceit on the part of these scientists. What scientist throws away data they have collected for decades and have made their life’s work?  I’ll answer this question.. NONE, unless you have something to hide.

Their findings are one of the main pieces of evidence used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which says global warming is a threat to humanity.

The IPCC is pressing for a full assault on the sovereignty of developed countries, which includes the United States.  The treaty which will be presented in Copenhagen outlines how the UN will be given control to regulate and tax developed countries, reallocating the funds to undeveloped countries in the pursuit of making them “greener.”

Oh but it gets more ominous when reading through what the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) want for the world with their 4 year strategy.  The UN during the Copenhagen conference is expecting developed partner countries from across the world to sign-on to these stipulations, regulations and the abdication of the countries sovereignty.

From Fox News:

—a major restructuring of international institutions to merge environmental issues with economics as the central priority. “We require an Environmental Bretton Woods for the 21st Century,” Halle argues — a reference to the meeting that laid the foundations of Western international finance and economic regulation after World War II. “The linkages between environmental sustainability and the economy will emerge as a key focus for public policymaking and a determinant of future markets opportunities,” according to the UNEP strategic plan. (emphais mine throughout)

The UN is attempting to takeover economic issues in UN partner countries to push their agenda of climate justice.  Meaning that the manufacturing process both structurally and the product the company makes will be controlled through the UN.  If they believe that a product is detrimental to the well-being of the planet or its inhabitants, the UN will either not allow the product to be manufactured or the product will be taxed out of existence.

—new environmental rules, regulations and standards, and the linking of existing environmental agreements, in a stronger global lattice-work of environmental law, with stronger authority to command national governments. The Swiss paper calls it a series of “ambitious yet incremental adjustments” to international environmental governance. Indeed, the document says, UNEP’s “role is to ‘tee up’ the next generation of such rules.”

The UN is looking to have control over sovereign governments such as control over certain aspects of the United States.  This is the same UN who can’t even safeguard women and child in Darfur from heinous attacks and murders.  The same UN who has terrorist states sitting on the UN Human Rights Council, allowing them to sanction through their silence acts which any reasonable person would condemn.  The same UN  that was over its head in scandal with Saddam Hussein with the food for oil thievery.

—an extensive propagandizing role for UNEP that reaches beyond its member governments and traditional environmental institutions to “children and youth” as well as business and political groups, to support UNEP strategic objectives.

Finally they admit to using propaganda in attempting to gain control over entire generations of Americans.  Oh yes, lets not look at solid science backed by replication, we can just teach our children the UN party line.  After one generation the children of this country will believe the whole man-made global warming BS even when presented with evidence that contradicts the lies.    Can we just we just call it what it is.. BRAINWASHING.

The only good thing is that any treaty signed Copenhagen must be ratified by two thirds of the Senate, according to Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution.

This does though bring us back to the Cap and Trade legislation which has already passed in the House and sits currently in the Senate.  The IPCC recommendations are the capstone for the Cap and Trade legislation in the United States. This legislation is destined, if passed, to ruin the US job market and the economy.  Just as the “scientists” have dumped the raw data which they base their claims on, so should the United States dump the Cap and Trade legislation currently in the Senate.

Comments are closed.