Calderon’s Address to Congress

Posted by courage On May - 25 - 2010

The Democrat’s gave a standing ovation to the two lie’s Calderon’s spoke while addressing Congress.  This maneuver of slapping the United States in the face was an attempt to meddle in United states sovereignty.  Do Democrats believe in the sovereignty of the United States of America or do they believe in a “international order” as the pResident stated a week ago during his commencement speech at West Point?  All indications point to the later, the Democrats do not believe in the principles of this country and desire to weaken the greatness of this country while  perpetuating its demise.   Did these Democratic Congress critters take an oath to uphold the US Constitution or was that mainly lip serve to gain power through a system that has deviated from its intent?  For me the the verdict is  out, we have enemies from within which threaten the country.

What were the two overt lies spoken by the President of Mexico?

Bob Owens from Pajamas Media spells it all out here.

It has already been widely reported that Calderon misrepresented Arizona’s new immigration enforcement law. His own nation’s laws punishing even poorer immigrants surging up from Central America are far more draconian, but the obvious hypocrisy apparently left no foul taste in his mouth.

If the federal government refuses to perform their duty as per the Constitution, Article  IV, Section 4. which states:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this union a Republican Form of Governance, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.

Arizona issued a 911 to Washington long ago, if the federal government secedes in their responsibility does not the state have an unalienable right to protect themselves?

And the second lie…

President Calderon’s assertion that Mexico has seized around 75,000 guns and assault weapons in the last three years — and that more than 80 percent of them came from the United States — is a bald-faced lie. It simply is not remotely connected to the truth.

Read the entire article at this link.

If advocating by their standing ovation the undermining of principles forwarded through the Constitution by the Democrats, are they not guilty of sedition?

For those unfamiliar with the term Webster defines sedition as:

incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority

Comments are closed.