Now we know what Pelosi meant when she stated once the Health care bill is passed “we’ll know what’s in it.”

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Obama’s health care overhaul law will increase the nation’s health care tab instead of bringing costs down, government economic forecasters concluded Thursday in a sobering assessment of the sweeping legislation.

A report by economic experts at the Health and Human Services Department said the health care remake will achieve Obama’s aim of expanding health insurance — adding 34 million Americans to the coverage rolls.

During the debate it was often asked how can you increase the numbers of those covered and decreased costs, mathematically it does work.  Finally someone in government is acknowledging that 1 + 1 = 2, not -2.

But the analysis also found that the law falls short of the president’s twin goal of controlling runaway costs. It also warned that Medicare cuts may be unrealistic and unsustainable, driving about 15% of hospitals into the red and “possibly jeopardizing access” to care for seniors.

How many times have I read that some hospitals and clinics will be forced to close because of the disparity between actual cost and reimbursement for services by the government?  “Jeopardizing access” are code words for closures of potentially 1.5 medical facilities of every 10 in a community.  This will hit rural areas the hardest, where the currently there may be 50 or more miles between facilities.

The mixed verdict for Obama’s signature issue is the first comprehensive look by neutral experts.

In particular, the warnings about Medicare could become a major political liability for Democratic lawmakers in the midterm elections. Seniors are more likely to vote than younger people and polls show they are already deeply skeptical of the law.

The report from Medicare’s Office of the Actuary carried a disclaimer saying it does not represent the official position of the Obama administration. White House officials have repeatedly complained that such analyses have been too pessimistic and lowball the law’s potential to achieve savings.

“Low ball the law’s potential to achieve savings” is code for don’t use the actual numbers in the bill to derive data analysis, rather use whimsical hope and change mantra.. and while your at it please feed the unicorn in the backyard.

The report acknowledged that some of the cost-control measures in the bill — Medicare cuts, a tax on high-cost insurance and a commission to seek ongoing Medicare savings — could help reduce the rate of cost increases beyond 2020. But it held out little hope for progress in the first decade.

“During 2010-2019, however, these effects would be outweighed by the increased costs associated with the expansions of health insurance coverage,” wrote Richard S. Foster, Medicare’s chief actuary. “Also, the longer-term viability of the Medicare … reductions is doubtful.” Foster’s office is responsible for long-range costs estimates.

Republicans said the findings validate their concerns about Obama’s 10-year, nearly $1 trillion plan to remake the nation’s health care system.

“A trillion dollars gets spent, and it’s no surprise — health care costs are going to go up,” said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., a leading Republican on health care issues. Camp added that he’s concerned the Medicare cuts will undermine coverage for seniors.

clip…

The health care law, passed by a divided Congress after a year of bitter partisan debate, would create new health insurance markets for individuals and small businesses. Starting in 2014, most Americans would be required to carry health insurance except in cases of financial hardship. Tax credits would help many middle-class households pay their premiums, while Medicaid would pick up more low-income people. Insurers would be required to accept all applicants, regardless of their health.

A separate Congressional Budget Office analysis, also released Thursday, estimated that 4 million households would be hit with tax penalties under the law for failing to get insurance.

Union members those premium health care packages you currently enjoy are going to be hit with taxes.  In fact when you received your W-2′s for 2010, you will see a box which includes the cost your employer pays for health care.. which is the amount you will taxed on.

clip..

The report’s most sober assessments concerned Medicare.

In addition to flagging the cuts to hospitals, nursing homes and other providers as potentially unsustainable, it projected that reductions in payments to private Medicare Advantage plans would trigger an exodus from the popular program. Enrollment would plummet by about 50%, as the plans reduce extra benefits that they currently offer. Seniors leaving the private plans would still have health insurance under traditional Medicare, but many might face higher out-of-pocket costs.

In another flashing yellow light, the report warned that a new voluntary long-term care insurance program created under the law faces “a very serious risk” of insolvency. (emphasis mine)

As the country faces unprecedented debt, unfunded liabilities will destroy the financial structure of the country.

America, the time to act is now.. get informed, question with boldness those in office and those seeking office.  Get behind a candidate with integrity and take action. VOTE !

Comments are closed.